Thank you 9th circuit nazis, for allowing the threat of violence to be enough to render free speech rights dead.

#9thcircuitfail   #liberalinjustice   #freedomofspeech  

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that officials’ concerns of racial violence outweighed students’ freedom of expression rights.

Global Warming Nazis, unite!

#globalwarmingfraud   #globalwarmingnazis  

“We recognize that separating humanity from nature, from the whole of life, leads to humankind’s own destruction and to the death of nations. Only through a re-integration of humanity into the whole of nature can our people be made stronger. That is the fundamental point of the biological tasks …

Note, "heads I win, tails you lose" is not science.
#globalwarmingfraud   #shoddyscience   #falsifiability  

emBooks LLC is the ebooks division of Melanie Phillips Electric Media LLC. It publishes ebooks that can be enjoyed on fixed screens and mobile devices. All emBooks provide quality reading entertainment, lavishly illustrated and focused on the moral and political issues of today.

So what happens when the next Republican president decides to waive ObamaCare until 2102?  Or waive income taxes?  Or waive recognition of gay marriages?

Checks and balances are there for a reason.  In an attempt to impose themselves upon others today, Democrats are laying the groundwork for others to impose upon them tomorrow.

#obamacarefail  

The Administration lacks legal authority to delay the employer mandate. This is another instance of rewriting the law while implementing it.

This is why the Bayesian defense of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming models can't hold water.

Falsifiability is what matters.  Karl Popper was right.

#falsifiability   #globalwarmingfraud  

P values, the ‘gold standard’ of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume.

If the government isn't willing to follow the law, why should citizens feel obligated to follow the law?

#obamacarefail  

In early 2011, Treasury and IRS officials realized they had a problem. They unanimously believed Congress intended to authorize certain taxes and subsidies in states that opt not to establish an ObamaCare “exchange.” At the same time, they recognized the law plainly does not allow those taxes and subsidies in those states.

Of course the idea of progressive taxation is a pernicious one (see http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mankiw/files/defending_the_one_percent.pdf), since it punishes success, but for those doubting that the US is, in fact not just in word, a progressively taxed nation, here's the cite.

That all being said, there really are two axes of argument here – one, should taxation be progressive, rather than equitable, and two, should government be larger or smaller.  You could make the argument for a progressive tax system that uses much less revenue, and you could make the argument for a regressive tax system that uses much more revenue (as apparently many of our european socialists do).

I like to think of government the way Clinton thought of abortion – safe, legal, and rare.

Compared to peer countries, the U.S. taxes the rich quite heavily. But it doesn’t spread what money it collects as equitably.